Sources
of the Implicit Priming Effect of the Syllable in Chinese Word Production
Jenn-Yeu Chen and Train-Min Chen
National Chung-Cheng University, Taiwan
The implicit priming task has been a useful tool for studying word-form
encoding in word production. In the task, the participants first learn
a set of word pairs. Then, the first word (prompt) of each pair is presented
one at a time, and the participants have to say the second word (target)
immediately. The target words are manipulated in such a way that in
one condition, they form several homogeneous blocks, wherein the words
share a particular morphophonological property (i.e., the implicit prime,
e.g., the first syllable), and in the other condition, the same words
form the heterogeneous blocks, wherein the words do not share the specified
property. The response times are typically faster in the homogeneous
blocks than in the heterogeneous blocks. The facilitation, commonly
referred to as the implicit priming (IP) effect, reflects the preparation
of some process(es) in word production, but the source(s) of the effect
has remained unclear. Meyer (1990) suggested that the effect reflected
the priming of the segments and the segment-to-frame association. Levelt,
Meyer, and Roelofs (1999) speculated that the effect had to do with
retrieval from the mental syllabary. We conducted several implicit priming
experiments with the syllable alone (8 experiments with 28 syllables)
or the syllable plus the tone (6 experiments with 23 syllables) as the
implicit primes. The syllables contained from one to three segments.
The IP effect was, on the average, 10 ms for the syllable alone prime,
and 45 ms for the syllable+tone prime. A meta-analysis was performed
to examine how the IP effects varied as a function of the type of the
prime and the length of the syllable. The results showed two regression
lines with similar slopes (8.32 and 10.68) but different intercepts
(-9.56 and 22.18) for the syllable alone and the syllable+tone primes,
respectively. Further analyses included the frequencies of the syllables.
The results showed that syllable length was the only contributing factor
in the syllable alone IP effect, but both syllable length and syllable+tone
frequency contributed to the syllable+tone IP effect. These findings
support at least two distinct processes in word-form encoding, one being
the segment-to-frame association and the other the retrieval of the
phonetic syllabary. The IP effect of the syllable alone is the result
of preparing the first process. The IP effect of the syllable plus the
tone is the combined result of preparing both processes.