Practiced
Imperfection: Costs and Benefits of Experience in Word Padraig G. O'Seaghdha and Kristine Schuster An extensive literature on expertise indicates that practice approaches
perfection over the long haul. Speaking is a nearly universal form of
expertise, but it is also a domain where specific difficulties are endemic.
Some difficulties arise due to inexperience with particular content
but others persist despite experience or are exacerbated by experience.
Most relevantly, difficulties at the phonological level in word production,
associated with frequency or speed of processing, make the interplay
of previous and new experience potentially very revealing. With this
motivation, we employed a tongue-twister-like word-pair repetition task
to illuminate processes of word production as a function of lifetime
experience (word frequency), experimental experience (multiple repetitions
of each pair in two sessions separated by several days), and word structure
(mono- or disyllable). Experience should lead to globally better performance
but may also exacerbate actual or incipient errors as a result of phonological
competition (O'Seaghdha & Marin, 2000) in related conditions relative
to unrelated controls. We assessed performance globally (number of correct
pair repetitions, For monosyllables, frequency facilitated and relatedness (e.g., web-well)
inhibited production in Session 1 by both local and global measures.
Duration measures showed diminished sensitivity in the second session.
Main effects in global measures were also reduced, but continuing effects
of frequency and relatedness were shown in an interaction (fewer correct
productions of related pairs in high frequency than low frequency conditions
relative to controls). For disyllables (e.g., margin-marble), where
relatedness comprised the first syllable, effects of frequency and relatedness
on durations were small in Session 1, but emerged clearly in conjunction
with an overall speed increase in Session 2. Frequency and Relatedness
effects were also present in global measures, but did not interact.
We will address the partial divergence of findings between monosyllables
and disyllables while stressing an underlying commonality of processes.
Core processes O'Seaghdha, P. G. & Marin, J. W. (2000). Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: Sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 57-73. |