Information
Structure and Local Discourse Interpretation: Thomas Weskott In the literature on information structure, the interpretation of constituents
dislocated to the left periphery (the Spec of CP) is mostly analysed
as being contrastive, i.e. as inducing a set of alternatives to the
focal constituent in that very position (s. (1) Den Kellner beleidigte der Gast ziemlich heftig. Rather, the construction can also be used without the typical prosodic
pattern associated with so-called 'contrastive topics'. This raises
the question how sentences like (1) should be interpreted. The proposal
made is that movement of direct objects of transitive verbs to the left
periphery is used by speakers to signal the hearer a certain local discourse
structure, taking the moved element as a starting point and thereby
inducing a particular perspective on the event sequence to be reported. To test the influence of the factors identified by the formal reconstruction, three self-paced reading experiments presenting short texts were conducted, manipulating (a) the word order (SO vs. OS), Reading times and error rates in subjects' answers to comprehension questions showed (over and above the well-established subject-first preference) significant effects of the factors (b) and (c) when comparing SO- vs. OS-structures. The findings suggest that these factors play a crucial role for licensing topicalization of direct objects in German V2 sentences. These results are then discussed in the light of Frazier's (1999) Extended Specifier Hypothesis. References Asher, Nicholas (1993): Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Buering, Daniel (1995): The 59th Street Bridge Accent. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tuebingen. Frazier, Lyn (1999): On Sentence Interpretation. Dordrecht: Kluwer. |